Funding Is Booming, Margins Are Not: RVs Are the Issue

There's an odd mood in European auto finance at the moment. Ask a treasurer how funding markets look and you get something close to delight. Ask the same person about disposal margins on the fleet coming back off-lease, and the tone shifts fast. That gap between how excited the money is and how nervous the metal is has become this fortnight's real story, and European auto ABS residual value risk sits right at the centre of it. Read either half on its own and you miss the point entirely.
European auto ABS issuance 2026 has hit record levels, with pricing tighter than almost any point in the last decade, a market clearly betting that credit quality behind these loans holds up well. At the same time, Ayvens Q2 2026 results tell a very different story: fleet lessor residual value risk showing up directly in the numbers, with a used-car disposal result that collapsed 80 per cent in a single quarter even as leasing margins climbed. Used car price normalisation Europe is still working through, auto ABS loss rates Fitch is forecasting are rising, not falling, and a change to the ECB collateral guideline residual value treatment this spring has quietly redrawn how balloon payment PCP residual risk gets classified for repo eligibility.
None of these threads sit comfortably next to each other, and that's exactly the point. This piece works through why the funding side and the residual value side of European auto finance are pulling in opposite directions right now, and what that gap actually means for anyone pricing new business or holding a book through it.
Why Are European Auto Finance Markets Sending Two Different Signals?
Because capital markets and used-car markets are, for once, telling two completely different stories about the same industry, and both happen to be true at once. Investors are pricing European auto paper as though little has changed. The vehicles sitting behind that paper tell a different story entirely about what they'll actually fetch in eighteen, twenty-four and thirty-six months. Ayvens Q2 2026 results capture that gap better than any market commentary could, a company with strong leasing margins and a disposal result that fell off a cliff in the same quarter.
Neither signal is technically wrong. The funding market is pricing what it can actually see, current default performance, structural protections, historical loss curves. What it can't fully see yet is how much of that historical performance was itself propped up by a used-car boom that isn't coming back, which means the paper being issued today is being priced against a recent past that's a poor guide to the next few years.
The Capital Markets Have Never Been This Generous
European auto asset-backed securities issuance hit €21.9 billion across 32 public transactions in the first half of 2026, against a 2016 to 2025 average for the same six months of just €11.8 billion and 18 deals, according to Fitch Ratings. That's close to double the historical norm, in a market investors are supposed to be treating with more caution, not less.
Pricing tells the same story. European auto ABS issuance 2026 has priced tighter than almost any point in the last decade. AUTO1 Group's third public consumer car loan securitisation, FinanceHero 3, priced on 6 July with a AAA-rated senior tranche and a blended spread across its six tranches of just 104.9 basis points over one-month Euribor. The book was covered more than 2.8 times. That's a market falling over itself to lend against European car paper, at spreads that would have looked ambitious two years ago.
A spread under 105 basis points on a consumer auto loan securitisation isn't just cheap money. It's investors explicitly betting the credit quality behind these loans holds up well enough to justify a coupon that thin, at exactly the moment Fitch is separately forecasting rising losses on the same asset class. Those two positions don't sit together comfortably for long.
Meanwhile, Back at the Depot: What Fitch's Fleet-Lessor Note Actually Says
Look at what all that funding is financing, and the picture gets considerably less comfortable. Fitch's companion note, published the same day as its ABS outlook, is blunt about it. Residual values are still falling across western Europe, the used-car price trough hasn't been reached yet, and gains on vehicle disposal for rated fleet lessors are expected to normalise back down toward pre-pandemic levels, well below the highs of 2022. Some lessors, Fitch notes almost in passing, are choosing to prioritise market share over margin, a polite way of saying a few players are buying volume by underpricing risk, and everyone else now has to decide whether to follow them down.
Fitch's note also flags real divergence by market, naming Italy, France, Romania, Türkiye and the Netherlands specifically. JD Power's own forecasting agrees, expecting Italy to see a significant fall in value retention this year against comparatively modest declines elsewhere, such as Austria. That divergence matters more than it sounds. A pan-European lessor averaging its RV curve across the whole book risks masking a genuinely painful exposure sitting inside numbers that look fine at group level.
A lessor with meaningful exposure to the Italian or Romanian fleet is looking at a materially different residual curve to one weighted toward Austria or the Nordics, yet both might report under the same group-level RV assumption if local market data isn't being fed back into pricing with enough granularity. That's exactly the kind of blending that lets a strong-looking average conceal a genuinely weak pocket of the book. This is why brand-level residual data, not just fleet averages, is the honest scorecard worth tracking, rather than one blended number that flatters the overall position.
Ayvens' Q2 Results: The Whole Story in One Company's Numbers
You don't need to take Fitch's word for it. Ayvens, Europe's largest fleet lessor, formed from the ALD and LeasePlan combination, posted second-quarter results that read like a case study in exactly this dynamic. Leasing and services margins came in at €762 million, up a healthy 7 per cent year on year, with underlying margins rising 9.5 per cent to €800 million. The core leasing business is fine.
But Ayvens' own Q2 2026 results confirming the used car sales result fell to -€8 million from €143 million a year earlier tell the rest of it. Across the first half, that disposal result fell from €253 million to €51 million, an 80 per cent collapse, even as leasing margins kept climbing. Chief Financial Officer Philippe de Rovira called this the used-car sales result "normalising," which is corporate speak for the extraordinary profits of the last few years not coming back. Fleet News' coverage of Ayvens' Q2 results and the "tough used car market" reported the quarter as strong overall, correctly, buybacks, dividends, cost synergies ahead of target, return on tangible equity above 13 per cent. All true, and all entirely compatible with a disposal line that just fell off a cliff in the same three months.
That's the whole article sitting in one company's numbers. The leasing engine, funded by all that cheap, abundant ABS money, is running well. The residual-value engine, where the real economics of a fleet business have always lived, is running in reverse.
What de Rovira didn't say matters as much as what he did. There was no suggestion this was a one-off quarter, a timing issue, or a market-specific blip. "Normalising" is a deliberate word choice, and it implies a new steady state rather than a dip that reverses next quarter. Anyone modelling Ayvens' disposal line back toward 2024 levels on the assumption this was unusual is working from the wrong starting point.
Why the Disconnect Is Structural, Not Seasonal
Three reasons this isn't cyclical noise that sorts itself out by next quarter.
The Used-Car Price Data Is Genuinely Soft
Used car price normalisation Europe is going through is real, and it's getting more real. AUTO1's Group Price Index moved to 138.7 in July, down 1.3 per cent month on month, before easing further to 136.4 in August. JD Power's own data shows the softening running sharper in six-to-eight-year-old cars than in nearly-new stock, with asking prices across Europe's five largest used markets only normalising through the first half, not recovering. It's also worth remembering the 2021-2022 windfall was a product of the chip shortage distorting used-car supply, not sound underwriting, so a fair amount of the pricing and provisioning built during those two golden years has been slow to unwind since. Cross-border remarketing smooths some of the bumps, but it's managing the problem rather than solving it. That's the same broader challenge sitting underneath why residual value forecasting is already being reshaped by a wave of Chinese brands with no European depreciation history to model against, RV curves everywhere are getting harder to trust, not just the ones tied to an ageing combustion fleet.
Credit Performance Is Deteriorating From a Low Base
Auto ABS loss rates Fitch is now forecasting are rising too. Fitch expects annualised loss rates on European auto ABS to climb to 0.75 per cent by year-end, up from 0.56 per cent in the second quarter, driven by persistent inflation and a cooling labour market. Record issuance and a deteriorating outlook rating are sitting in the same sentence, from the same agency, on the same day, and investors aren't being paid more for that deterioration. Spreads, as FinanceHero 3 showed, are moving the other way entirely.
The Regulatory Plumbing Underneath Residual Risk Changed in Spring
ECB collateral guideline residual value treatment shifted meaningfully this year. The ECB's amended collateral guideline, effective from 30 March, introduced a tighter definition of residual value risk for Eurosystem repo eligibility. Where a structure lets the obligor hand back the vehicle in full settlement without recourse for any shortfall, the classic balloon payment PCP residual risk consumer loan or finance lease, that exposure is now more likely classified as residual value risk regardless of any manufacturer buy-back or dealer repurchase guarantee sitting behind it. Structures that relied on third-party guarantees to keep balloon exposure out of the residual-value bucket can no longer assume that treatment holds, a live question for anyone with balloon or PCP-heavy pools right now, arriving in the same year values got less generous at exactly the wrong moment.
The ECB's Collateral Rule Change Nobody's Talking About
That ECB shift deserves more attention than it's getting, because it lands alongside a wider regulatory tightening across the sector. CCD2's tightened disclosure and creditworthiness rules arrive the same year residual assumptions are getting harder to trust, meaning firms are being asked to evidence fair value and realistic affordability at precisely the moment the residual value inputs feeding those assessments are becoming less reliable themselves. Fleet lessor residual value risk isn't just a treasury and pricing conversation anymore. It's becoming a compliance one too, and the two teams handling it may not currently be talking to each other as closely as they need to.
A captive that structured its balloon exposure around a manufacturer guarantee two or three years ago did so under assumptions that held at the time. The guarantee hasn't changed. The regulatory treatment of it has, and going back through every pool built on that assumption is exactly the kind of unglamorous, resource-heavy work that gets deprioritised until a refinancing forces the question, at which point it's considerably harder to fix.
What This Means for Anyone Running a Book
None of this is a crisis. It's a margin-mix problem, manageable if you see it coming rather than getting surprised by it a year from now.
Stop Reading "Strong Results" Headlines at Face Value
Ayvens' quarter was reported, correctly, as strong. All true, and all compatible with a disposal line that just collapsed. Ask the disaggregated question of your own book: is leasing margin doing the actual work, or is disposal margin quietly bailing it out without anyone noticing?
Reprice New Business for a Lower Disposal Tailwind
Contracts written in 2024 to 2025 against 2022-peak residual assumptions are exactly the ones generating surprises now. New business should assume disposal gains closer to pre-pandemic norms, and resist matching competitors chasing market share with optimistic RV assumptions purely to defend a league-table position that won't matter once the disposal bill lands.
Check Securitised Pools Against the March ECB Guideline Now
If balloon or return-option structures make up a meaningful share of repo-eligible collateral, confirm current eligibility with treasury and legal directly, rather than assuming historical treatment still applies. Revisit manufacturer buy-back terms in the same conversation, since captives leaning on OEM guarantees may find they no longer secure the treatment they used to under the new definition.
Separate the Two Conversations Internally
Given how closely residual assumptions now sit alongside Consumer Duty and CCD2-style fair value obligations, treasury, pricing and compliance need to be working from the same RV data at the same time, not reconciling three separate versions of it after the fact. A firm that lets these teams run on different assumptions is building a gap that eventually surfaces somewhere expensive, a mispriced contract, a failed audit, or both.
Use the Strong Funding Window While It Lasts
The ABS market is about as accommodating as it's been in a decade, on spread and on size. That window tends not to stay this wide once still-low-but-rising loss rates start showing up more visibly in performance data, and it won't stay open for everyone equally. Issuers with needs on the horizon should move now rather than wait for a more comfortable moment that may not turn up.
The lessors and captives that come out ahead over the next year won't be the ones with the cheapest funding, because funding is cheap for almost everyone right now. They'll be the ones who priced new business for the residual-value world we're actually in, rather than the one the ABS market's enthusiasm might tempt anyone into assuming instead.
Frequently Asked Questions
1.Why did Ayvens' used car sales result turn negative?
Ayvens' net used-car sales result swung from a €143 million profit to an €8 million loss in Q2 2026 as residual values normalised down from 2022's pandemic-era peaks, even as its core leasing margins rose 9.5 per cent over the same period.
2.What changed in the ECB's collateral guideline for residual value risk?
Effective from 30 March 2026, the ECB tightened its definition of residual value risk for Eurosystem repo eligibility, meaning balloon payment or full-settlement structures are now more likely classified as residual value exposure regardless of manufacturer buy-back guarantees behind them.
3.Is European auto ABS issuance at record levels in 2026?
Yes. First-half 2026 issuance reached €21.9 billion across 32 public transactions, nearly double the 2016-2025 average of €11.8 billion and 18 deals for the same period, according to Fitch Ratings.
4.Why are used car prices still falling across Europe?
Used car price normalisation is unwinding the artificial highs created by the 2021-2022 chip shortage, with AUTO1's Group Price Index falling through July and August 2026 and JD Power data showing sharper declines in six-to-eight-year-old vehicles than nearly-new stock.
5.How are auto ABS loss rates trending in Europe?
Fitch expects annualised loss rates on European auto ABS to rise to 0.75 per cent by year-end 2026, up from 0.56 per cent in the second quarter, driven by persistent inflation and a cooling labour market, even as issuance hits record highs.
6.What should fleet lessors do about balloon payment and PCP residual risk right now?
Check securitised pools against the ECB's March 2026 collateral guideline directly with treasury and legal teams, revisit manufacturer buy-back terms that may no longer secure favourable treatment, and reprice new business assuming disposal gains closer to pre-pandemic norms rather than 2022 peaks.



